It should not come as a surprise to me that race is not a biological
reality. It makes sense from what I know
about biology that humans are all part of the same species. There are no humanoid sub-species—those only
exist in science fiction. Having said
that, I found myself amazed at the idea that race has no genetic basis as I
watched a PBS series called “Race: The Power of an Illusion” (Herbes-Sommers, Strain, & Smith, 2003). Geneticists compared human DNA and found just
as many variations between two people from the same race as between two people
with different skin color and facial features.
In other words, race is only skin deep.
All human DNA examined up until now contains all the same components
with only variations on the same theme: blue or brown eyes, straight or curly
hair, long or short legs, a tongue that does or does not curl, etc.
So what is race? How have we
arrived at the concept of different group of people who are divided by the way
that they look instead of language and/or a shared culture? Why is it that a person of Chinese descent,
who speaks English and eats pizza on a regular basis, should select “Asian” on the
U.S. census survey? Or that someone
living the U.S. who has dark skin and is not Hispanic or Asian will be referred
to as “black” whether they have “white” ancestry or not? Why is “whiteness” viewed as a monolithic
racial category when the concept has changed over time (e.g. Irish immigrants
in the 1900s were not considered white)?
If race is not “real,” then why are there a multitude of euphemisms we
to talk about other groups of people?
For example, in St. Louis the mention of geographic locations calls to
mind specific racialized contexts. If
someone mentions “South County” it is usually in reference to a specific group
of people, namely middle-class white people.
Conversely, the mention “Jefferson County” is often the punch line to
some comment about impoverished white people.
A reference to “the city” or “North County” generally translates to “the
area where black people live,” and more often than not signals recognition of
some level of poverty. Similarly, the
words “urban,” “inner city,” “diverse” and “multicultural” indicate the
presence of people of color. On the
other hand, why is it that obviously racialized comments (e.g. white church,
black neighborhood) elicit such perplexing responses accompanied with intense
feelings?
“It’s
not so much race as it is culture.” “Why
can’t we just be ‘race neutral’?” “I
prefer to be ‘color-blind.’” “I’m not
racist—I have black/Asian/Hispanic friends.”
“The U.S. isn’t the only country that has race problems, you know.” “Hey, black people can be racist, too.” “White people just don’t get it.”
Are we living in a “post-racial” society? Does race matter? And if so, how does it matter? One does not have to look very hard to find reports
of disparity with regards to race. For
example, the Washington Post recently reported that white people earned more
than three-fourths of the total income in the U.S. (Morello, 2012). The
article cites higher levels of education for non-Hispanic whites and Asians as
one of the primary reason for this inequity. Another example, and the topic of my friend’s
dissertation, is that black women are more likely to die from breast cancer
than white women in the U.S. (Pittman, 2012). It seems
that while race does not exist as a biological reality, it can make a
difference in terms of life outcomes, academic and economic achievement, as
well as health and well-being. Why is
this so? Does culture contribute to these inequalities? What about the role of education? The following series of blogs will examine the
social construction of race, racial inequality in urban education, white privilege, and
racism.
References
Herbes-Sommers, C., Strain, T. H., & Smith, L. (2003). Race: The
power of an illusion [Television Series]. San Francisco, CA: California
Newsreel & Independent Television Service.
Morello, C. (2012, May 31). Whites earn
more than three-fourths of the nation’s income. The Washington Post.
Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/whites-earn-more-than-34-of-the-nations-income/2012/05/31/gJQA1rrk4U_story.html
Pittman, G. (2012, March 21). Black women
more likely to die of breast cancer. Reuters. New York. Retrieved from
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/21/us-black-women-breast-cancer-idUSBRE82K1CZ20120321
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be kind. This blog should promote healthy dialogue.